The fight over AI summaries is part of a larger struggle playing out in newsrooms figuring out where human editors still fit ...

More websites, including Wikipedia and academic archives, are grousing about AI freeloaders that siphon their information.

An analysis found that about 40% of over 1,000 randomly selected Wikipedia articles contain outdated or incorrect information ...

Following The New York Times, The Washington Post and The Atlantic, the online encyclopedia now has daily activities ...

Wikipedia halts its AI summary rollout after human editors raise concerns about credibility. Wikipedia has long allowed its (human) users to add and edit entries. Recently, it rolled out AI summaries ...

Editors almost immediately criticized the pilot, raising concerns that it could damage Wikipedia's credibility.

First reported by Kotaku, Wikipedia recently introduced a quiz game on its official Android app, called Which Came First? The game has a simple premise, which you could probably g ...

The Wikimedia Foundation, a nonprofit group that hosts, develops, and controls Wikipedia, has announced that it won’t be moving forward with plans to add AI-generated summaries to articles after ...

According to 404 Media, Wikipedia announced the opt-in AI pilot on June 2, which was set to run for two weeks on the mobile version of the site. The summaries appeared at the top of select articles in ...